100 MILLION SCREAM FOR JUSTICE DENIED FOR YOUNG CHRISTIAN HERO
"100
million
Christians
cried
out
in
one
voice
in
outrage
for
the
disgraceful
betrayal
by
the
U.S.
Supreme
Court
of
the
religious
liberty
of
Liam
Morrison
today.
They
are
the
subscribers,
supporters
and
Americans
who
responded
to
Liam's
testimony
at
a
school
board
meeting
on
our
social
media
posts.
The
Court
has
lost
its
status
due
to
its
self-destructive
treatment
of
free
speech,"
says
Eugene
Delgaudio.
ONE OF SEVERAL POSTS, THIS ONE POST HAS 18 MILLION VIEWS, ON SOCIAL MEDIA TOTALING 100 MILLION VIEWS
The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear the case of a student who was barred from wearing a T-shirt to school proclaiming "there are only two genders."
Liam Morrison and his parents sued his Massachusetts public middle school for not allowing him to wear his T-shirt, saying that it infringed on his freedom of speech, according to Reuters.
The 1st Circuit decision stated that the message on Morrison's T-shirt "denying the existence of the gender identities of transgender and gender nonconforming students would have a serious negative impact on those students' ability to concentrate on their classroom work."
In turning down Morrison's appeal, the lower court's decision upholds the ban.
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that lower courts are "confused on how to manage the tension between students' rights and schools' obligations" and believes that students and educators deserve "clarity on this critically important question."
DELGAUDIO posted on social media :
"The Supreme Court should have heard the case of Liam Massachusetts student who wanted to wear 'only two genders' T-shirt. SCOTUS Justice Alito wrote, noting that "the school permitted and indeed encouraged student expression endorsing the view that there are many genders," but censored an opposing view. "This case presents an issue of great importance for our Nation's youth: whether public schools may suppress student speech either because it expresses a viewpoint that the school disfavors or because of vague concerns about the likely effect of the speech on the school atmosphere or on students who find the speech offensive," Alito wrote."