Victory: Supreme Court Upholds Bans on Trans Surgery on children
PUBLIC ADVOCATE BRIEF IN THIS CASE ASSAILS THE TRANSGENDER LOBBY LIES
COPY OF SUPREME COURT RULING HERE
For Immediate Release, permission granted in advance for any media use.
Statement of Eugene Delgaudio, president of Public Advocate
"Thank God, The Supreme Court just upheld the right of Tennessee to ban transgender surgery and pharmaceutical drugs to effect sex changes on minors.
This Opinion was written by Chief Justice Roberts; there were many concurring opinions; Justices Sotomayor Jackson Kagan were dissenting.
The Supreme Court ruled that Tennessee's law prohibiting certain medical treatments for transgender minors (drugs/surgery) satisfies rational basis review under the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The Court rejected the argument that the state law was a "sex-based classification," but the court said a mere reference to sex triggers heightened scrutiny. It also rejected arguments based on sex stereotyping. The Court said Bostock does not apply, limiting it further -- which is always refreshing to hear.
Once again, Justice Thomas made the most sense. He took a mild swing at Gorsuch's disgraceful Bostock decision in his concurring opinion, warning against any use of Bostock (interpreting a statute) in a constitutional case. And he warned against depending on experts and professional associations of experts to over-ride legislatures and are absolutely useless in understanding what the constitution actually means. Praise the Lord for Justice Thomas.
PUBLIC ADVOCATE spent half of our brief attacking the WPATH pro-trannie organization and its phony science, and Justice Thomas spent half of his opinion attacking the WPATH organization. Justice Thomas is a heroic historical influence on protecting America's children from this attrocity," said Delgaudio.